Serveur d'exploration sur le peuplier

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Parental resource and offspring liability: the influence of extrafloral nectar on oviposition by a leaf-mining moth.

Identifieur interne : 002560 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002559; suivant : 002561

Parental resource and offspring liability: the influence of extrafloral nectar on oviposition by a leaf-mining moth.

Auteurs : Brent Mortensen [États-Unis] ; Diane Wagner ; Patricia Doak

Source :

RBID : pubmed:23223861

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

For many insect herbivores, maternal host selection is a critical determinant of offspring survival; however, maternal fitness is also affected by adult resources such as food availability. Consequently, adult resources may promote oviposition in sub-optimal locations when measured in terms of offspring performance. We tested whether oviposition site preference is primarily shaped by proximity to adult food resources or offspring performance in the aspen leaf miner (Phyllocnistis populiella). Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) produce extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) on a subset of their leaves. EFN expression on leaves is associated with decreased P. populiella damage and larval performance; however, P. populiella adults feed from EFNs. We reduced extrafloral nectar availability on entire aspen ramets and excluded crawling predators in a full factorial experiment at two sites in interior Alaska, USA. Patterns of egg deposition by P. populiella appeared to be primarily affected by offspring survival rather than adult resource availability. While oviposition was unaffected by nectar availability, adult moths laid fewer eggs on leaves with than without EFNs. By avoiding leaves with EFNs, moths increased offspring survival. Both moths and predators distinguished between leaves with and without EFNs even when nectar and visual cues were obscured, and therefore may respond to chemical cues associated with EFN expression.

DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2525-3
PubMed: 23223861


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Parental resource and offspring liability: the influence of extrafloral nectar on oviposition by a leaf-mining moth.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mortensen, Brent" sort="Mortensen, Brent" uniqKey="Mortensen B" first="Brent" last="Mortensen">Brent Mortensen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology and Wildlife, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7000, USA. bdm@iastate.edu</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology and Wildlife, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7000</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Alaska</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wagner, Diane" sort="Wagner, Diane" uniqKey="Wagner D" first="Diane" last="Wagner">Diane Wagner</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Doak, Patricia" sort="Doak, Patricia" uniqKey="Doak P" first="Patricia" last="Doak">Patricia Doak</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:23223861</idno>
<idno type="pmid">23223861</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00442-012-2525-3</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002776</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002776</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002776</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">002776</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002776</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Parental resource and offspring liability: the influence of extrafloral nectar on oviposition by a leaf-mining moth.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mortensen, Brent" sort="Mortensen, Brent" uniqKey="Mortensen B" first="Brent" last="Mortensen">Brent Mortensen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology and Wildlife, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7000, USA. bdm@iastate.edu</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology and Wildlife, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7000</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Alaska</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wagner, Diane" sort="Wagner, Diane" uniqKey="Wagner D" first="Diane" last="Wagner">Diane Wagner</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Doak, Patricia" sort="Doak, Patricia" uniqKey="Doak P" first="Patricia" last="Doak">Patricia Doak</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Oecologia</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1432-1939</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2013" type="published">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Animals (MeSH)</term>
<term>Female (MeSH)</term>
<term>Moths (physiology)</term>
<term>Oviposition (MeSH)</term>
<term>Plant Leaves (MeSH)</term>
<term>Plant Nectar (MeSH)</term>
<term>Populus (parasitology)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Animaux (MeSH)</term>
<term>Femelle (MeSH)</term>
<term>Feuilles de plante (MeSH)</term>
<term>Nectar des plantes (MeSH)</term>
<term>Oviposition (MeSH)</term>
<term>Papillons de nuit (physiologie)</term>
<term>Populus (parasitologie)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en">
<term>Plant Nectar</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="parasitologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="parasitology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Papillons de nuit</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Moths</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Animals</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Oviposition</term>
<term>Plant Leaves</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Animaux</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Feuilles de plante</term>
<term>Nectar des plantes</term>
<term>Oviposition</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">For many insect herbivores, maternal host selection is a critical determinant of offspring survival; however, maternal fitness is also affected by adult resources such as food availability. Consequently, adult resources may promote oviposition in sub-optimal locations when measured in terms of offspring performance. We tested whether oviposition site preference is primarily shaped by proximity to adult food resources or offspring performance in the aspen leaf miner (Phyllocnistis populiella). Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) produce extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) on a subset of their leaves. EFN expression on leaves is associated with decreased P. populiella damage and larval performance; however, P. populiella adults feed from EFNs. We reduced extrafloral nectar availability on entire aspen ramets and excluded crawling predators in a full factorial experiment at two sites in interior Alaska, USA. Patterns of egg deposition by P. populiella appeared to be primarily affected by offspring survival rather than adult resource availability. While oviposition was unaffected by nectar availability, adult moths laid fewer eggs on leaves with than without EFNs. By avoiding leaves with EFNs, moths increased offspring survival. Both moths and predators distinguished between leaves with and without EFNs even when nectar and visual cues were obscured, and therefore may respond to chemical cues associated with EFN expression.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">23223861</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>03</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1939</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>172</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>Jul</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Oecologia</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Oecologia</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Parental resource and offspring liability: the influence of extrafloral nectar on oviposition by a leaf-mining moth.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>767-77</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00442-012-2525-3</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>For many insect herbivores, maternal host selection is a critical determinant of offspring survival; however, maternal fitness is also affected by adult resources such as food availability. Consequently, adult resources may promote oviposition in sub-optimal locations when measured in terms of offspring performance. We tested whether oviposition site preference is primarily shaped by proximity to adult food resources or offspring performance in the aspen leaf miner (Phyllocnistis populiella). Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) produce extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) on a subset of their leaves. EFN expression on leaves is associated with decreased P. populiella damage and larval performance; however, P. populiella adults feed from EFNs. We reduced extrafloral nectar availability on entire aspen ramets and excluded crawling predators in a full factorial experiment at two sites in interior Alaska, USA. Patterns of egg deposition by P. populiella appeared to be primarily affected by offspring survival rather than adult resource availability. While oviposition was unaffected by nectar availability, adult moths laid fewer eggs on leaves with than without EFNs. By avoiding leaves with EFNs, moths increased offspring survival. Both moths and predators distinguished between leaves with and without EFNs even when nectar and visual cues were obscured, and therefore may respond to chemical cues associated with EFN expression.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Mortensen</LastName>
<ForeName>Brent</ForeName>
<Initials>B</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Biology and Wildlife, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7000, USA. bdm@iastate.edu</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Wagner</LastName>
<ForeName>Diane</ForeName>
<Initials>D</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Doak</LastName>
<ForeName>Patricia</ForeName>
<Initials>P</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2012</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>08</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>Germany</Country>
<MedlineTA>Oecologia</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0150372</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0029-8549</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D057048">Plant Nectar</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D009036" MajorTopicYN="N">Moths</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D010058" MajorTopicYN="Y">Oviposition</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D018515" MajorTopicYN="Y">Plant Leaves</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D057048" MajorTopicYN="Y">Plant Nectar</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000469" MajorTopicYN="Y">parasitology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2012</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>03</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2012</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2012</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2012</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>5</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23223861</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00442-012-2525-3</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList>
<Reference>
<Citation>Environ Entomol. 2012 Feb;41(1):180-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22525074</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Chem Ecol. 1994 Sep;20(9):2455-66</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24242817</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>New Phytol. 2008;178(1):41-61</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18086230</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Planta. 2008 Aug;228(3):449-57</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18493790</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 1999 May;119(2):227-230</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28307972</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 2008 Aug;157(2):259-67</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18523809</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Ecology. 2008 Jan;89(1):134-44</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18376555</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Ecology. 2008 May;89(5):1364-74</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18543629</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Ann Bot. 2007 Dec;100(6):1337-46</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17951361</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Environ Entomol. 2008 Aug;37(4):996-1002</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18801266</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Am J Bot. 2010 Apr;97(4):601-10</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21622422</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 2011 Apr;165(4):983-93</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20931234</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Oct 22;267(1457):2065-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11416910</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Biometrics. 1997 Sep;53(3):983-97</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9333350</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 2011 Jun;166(2):411-20</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21113623</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Annu Rev Entomol. 2007;52:301-23</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16972766</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>New Phytol. 2006;172(3):412-28</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17083673</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Environ Entomol. 2007 Apr;36(2):383-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17445373</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Alaska</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Doak, Patricia" sort="Doak, Patricia" uniqKey="Doak P" first="Patricia" last="Doak">Patricia Doak</name>
<name sortKey="Wagner, Diane" sort="Wagner, Diane" uniqKey="Wagner D" first="Diane" last="Wagner">Diane Wagner</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="États-Unis">
<region name="Alaska">
<name sortKey="Mortensen, Brent" sort="Mortensen, Brent" uniqKey="Mortensen B" first="Brent" last="Mortensen">Brent Mortensen</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002560 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002560 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    PoplarV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:23223861
   |texte=   Parental resource and offspring liability: the influence of extrafloral nectar on oviposition by a leaf-mining moth.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:23223861" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 12:07:19 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 12:16:31 2020